Three Models of Sequential Belief Updating on Uncertain Evidence
نویسنده
چکیده
Jeffrey updating is a natural extension of Bayesian updating to cases where the evidence is uncertain. But, the resulting degrees of belief appear to be sensitive to the order in which the uncertain evidence is acquired, a rather un-Bayesian looking effect. This order dependence results from the way in which basic Jeffrey updating is usually extended to sequences of updates. The usual extension seems very natural, but there are other plausible ways to extend Bayesian updating that maintain order-independence. I will explore three models of sequential updating, the usual extension and two alternatives. I will show that the alternative updating schemes derive from extensions of the usual rigidity requirement, which is at the heart of Jeffrey updating. Finally, I will establish necessary and sufficient conditions for order-independent updating, and show that extended rigidity is closely related to these conditions.
منابع مشابه
A New Conditioning Rule, Its Generalization and Evidential Reasoning
Abstract In Evidence theory, several conditioning rules for updating belief have been proposed, including Dempster’s rule of conditioning. The paper views the conditioning rules proposed so far and proposes a new rule of conditioning based on three requirements. Then, it generalizes the rule to be applied to the case where condition is given by an uncertain belief. The paper also discusses a fe...
متن کاملRelevance-Based Sequential Evidence Processing in Bayesian Networks
1-~.levance reasoning in Bayesian networks can be la~ed to improve efficiency of belief updating ",dgorithaL~ by identit~ing and pruning those parts of a network that are irrelevant ibr the computation. Relevance reaqoning is based on the graphical property of d-separation and other simple and efficient techniques, the computational complexity of which is usuaUy negligible when compared to the ...
متن کاملRelevance - based Sequential Evidence Processing in Bayesian
Relevance reasoning in Bayesian networks can be used to improve eeciency of belief updating algorithms by identifying and pruning those parts of a network that are irrelevant for the computation. Relevance reasoning is based on the graphical property of d{separation and other simple and eecient techniques, the computational complexity of which is usually negligible when compared to the complexi...
متن کاملA Bayesian Sequential Sampling Model of Choice Reaction Time Incorporating Stimulus Onset/Duration Uncertainty
We propose a Bayesian sequential sampling model of choice reaction time (RT) which incorporates uncertainties about stimulus identity, onset, and duration. The model is the nowstandard random-walk/drift-diffusion model, with a thresholdbased response mechanism. The “substance” of the drift, however, is the posterior probability (belief) that a participant updates on a moment-to-moment basis dur...
متن کاملImprecise belief updating for uncertain user modelling
In this paper we present a new approach to incremental user recognition in fuzzy environments where user classification is updated within an epistemological model. We extend Einhorn and Hogarth’s anchor and adjustment method ([7]), itself derived from a study of human behaviour, from the point value representation of belief and evidence to the case where belief and evidence are imprecise. We re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Philosophical Logic
دوره 33 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004